The Jobava London System: attacking with 1.d4 without memorizing endless lines
1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4 trades the slow solidity of the classical London for direct plans — Nb5 hitting c7, the e4 break and the h4 assault.
7 min read · Updated on 2026-08-30
Short answer
The Jobava London is the classical London with a knight on c3 instead of a pawn on c3: White gives up the c2-c4 break to gain attacking tempo. There are three plans — Nb5 pressing c7, the e4 lever and the h4-h5 assault against a fianchetto — and they fit on a single page of notes.
The essentials in a few lines
- The move order is 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4: the knight on c3 before e3 is what separates the Jobava from the classical London.
- The price of the system is giving up c2-c4; the compensation is speed, with active pieces by move five.
- Nb5 is the signature move: it eyes c7 and forces Black to spend a defensive tempo in the opening.
- Against ...g6 structures the plan is Qd2, Bh6 and h4-h5 — the most dangerous setup in the whole system.
- The critical replies are 3...c5 and 3...e6 followed by ...Bd6: know both before you play the system for real.
What changes compared to the classical London
What is the Jobava London System and how does it start?
The Jobava London System starts with 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4. The difference from the traditional London is the second move: instead of supporting the center with c2-c3 and e2-e3, White develops the knight to c3 at once, giving up the c2-c4 break in order to play for Nb5, e2-e4 and a fast kingside attack.
The classical London became popular because it can be played almost on autopilot: Bf4, e3, Nf3, Bd3, c3, Nbd2. The Jobava keeps the low theory cost but changes the character of the position — instead of waiting for a mistake in a stable structure, White creates concrete threats from the first moves.
The trade has a real cost worth understanding before adopting it: with the knight on c3, the c-pawn is stuck and c2-c4, the natural lever of every 1.d4 player, disappears. In exchange, development is faster and the initiative arrives early, which pays off in online games at short time controls.
- The same scheme against nearly everything: Nc3, Bf4, e3, Nf3 or f3, Bd3 and Qd2.
- No long forcing lines to memorize — you study plans, not sequences.
- It works against 1...d5 and against the Indian defenses, which is what makes the repertoire cheap to maintain.
| ♜ | ♞ | ♝ | ♛ | ♚ | ♝ | ♜ | |
| ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | |
| ♞ | |||||||
| ♟ | |||||||
| ♙ | ♗ | ||||||
| ♘ | |||||||
| ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | |
| ♖ | ♕ | ♔ | ♗ | ♘ | ♖ |
Full line: 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4
The three ideas that repeat in every game
What are White's attacking plans in the Jobava London?
Three: Nb5 pressing c7 and forcing an early concession; the e2-e4 lever, often prepared with f3, to open the center with pieces already active; and the h4-h5 assault against a short castle, especially when Black fianchettoes the bishop on g7.
Nb5 is the calling card of the system. It threatens Nc7+ winning the a8 rook and, when Black defends with ...Na6 or ...Nc6, the black pieces end up slightly awkward. There is even a resource that startles anyone seeing it for the first time: in some positions White plays Bxb8, giving up the bishop pair to remove the defender of c7 and leave the square genuinely weak.
The e2-e4 lever is the second theme. With the c-pawn stuck, e4 is how White opens the game, often after f3 and Qd2. Against players who go for ...g6 and ...Bg7, the third theme almost plays itself: Qd2 and Bh6 to trade off the defending bishop, followed by h4-h5 hitting the pawn chain.
- Nb5 eyes c7 and gains time — but watch for ...a6, which prevents it before it happens.
- f3 and e4 open the center once Black has committed on a flank.
- Qd2 and Bh6 trade the g7 bishop; without it, h4-h5 becomes a real attack.
- Long castling is the sharpest version of the plan, and the one demanding most care about your own king.
| ♜ | ♞ | ♝ | ♛ | ♚ | ♝ | ♜ | |
| ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ||
| ♟ | ♞ | ||||||
| ♘ | ♟ | ||||||
| ♙ | ♗ | ||||||
| ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | |
| ♖ | ♕ | ♔ | ♗ | ♘ | ♖ |
Full line: 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4 e6 4.Nb5
| ♜ | ♞ | ♝ | ♛ | ♜ | ♚ | ||
| ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ||
| ♞ | ♟ | ♕ | |||||
| ♟ | |||||||
| ♙ | ♙ | ||||||
| ♘ | |||||||
| ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ||
| ♖ | ♔ | ♗ | ♘ | ♖ |
Full line: 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.Bf4 Bg7 4.Qd2 O-O 5.Bh6 Bxh6 6.Qxh6 c5 7.h4
What to do against each common reply
How do you meet the main defenses against the Jobava London?
Against 3...c5, play e3 and keep the central tension instead of releasing it early. Against 3...e6 and ...Bd6, take on d6 and use the resulting structure with Nb5 or e4. Against 3...a6, which prevents Nb5, switch to the e4 plan. Against ...g6 structures, go straight for Qd2 and Bh6.
Note that four of the five lines end in the same development, differing only in move order. That is what makes the Jobava viable for someone studying a few hours a week: maintenance is cheap, and the effort goes into recognizing which of the three plans the position is asking for.
| ♜ | ♝ | ♛ | ♚ | ♝ | ♜ | ||
| ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ||
| ♞ | ♞ | ||||||
| ♘ | ♟ | ♟ | |||||
| ♙ | ♗ | ||||||
| ♙ | |||||||
| ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ||
| ♖ | ♕ | ♔ | ♗ | ♘ | ♖ |
Full line: 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bf4 c5 4.e3 Nc6 5.Nb5
| Black's reply | What it wants | Practical handling |
|---|---|---|
| 3...c5 | Hitting the center before White gets organized | e3 and normal development; capturing on c5 early hands over the center for nothing |
| 3...e6 and ...Bd6 | Trading off the f4 bishop, the key piece of the system | Bxd6 and cxd6 changes the structure: play for e4 and the half-open file |
| 3...a6 | Taking Nb5 off the table before anything else | e3, Nf3 and Bd3 with the e4 plan — the tempo Black spent on ...a6 is yours |
| 3...Bf5 | Developing the bishop before closing with ...e6 | f3 preparing e4, gaining space with tempo on the bishop |
| 2...g6 and ...Bg7 | King's Indian or Grünfeld structures | Bf4, Qd2, Bh6 and h4-h5: this is where the system bites hardest |
Where the system actually suffers
What are the weaknesses of the Jobava London?
Two, both strategic: without c2-c4, White struggles to generate queenside play, and a well-timed 3...c5 hands the center back to Black. Against opponents who know the system and trade the f4 bishop early, the game turns into an ordinary queen's pawn position without the initiative that justifies the setup.
It is worth being honest about this when building a repertoire: the Jobava scores best against players who do not know it, and especially well at short time controls, where the practical value of direct threats is high. Against serious preparation in classical games it does not claim a theoretical edge — it claims a position White understands better.
That is not a flaw unique to this system. It applies to any low-theory scheme, and it is exactly why repertoire choice has to account for the time control you play and the opponents you face, not just for the engine's evaluation on move ten.
- Without c2-c4 the queenside has no natural lever: the game has to happen in the center or on the kingside.
- Black setups with ...c5 and ...Qb6 hit b2 and d4 at once — know that configuration before you commit.
- Once the f4 bishop is traded, reassess: the attacking plan is gone and the game turns technical.
A three-week route
How long does it take to play the Jobava with confidence?
About three weeks of directed study. One week for the Nb5 plan and the replies with ...e6 and ...a6, one for the setup against ...g6 with Qd2, Bh6 and h4, and one playing nothing but the system in fast games, reviewing only the games where the plan went astray.
- Week 1: 3...e6, 3...a6 and the Nb5 theme — ten annotated games, watching for when c7 becomes a real target.
- Week 2: ...g6 structures and the Qd2, Bh6, h4-h5 plan, plus what to do when Black avoids the bishop trade.
- Week 3: fast games with the system only, reviewing exclusively the losses caused by the wrong plan.
- At the end of three weeks, compare your score with your previous repertoire before deciding to keep it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Jobava London good for beginners?
It is, with one advantage: since development is nearly always the same, a beginner will not lose in the opening for lack of theory. The caveat is that the attacking plans demand tactical calculation — the system produces positions with active pieces, and a player who calculates poorly hands the initiative straight back.
What is the difference between the Jobava London and the classical London?
In the classical London White plays c3 and Nbd2, keeping a solid, slow structure. In the Jobava the knight goes to c3 and the c-pawn is stuck: you lose the c2-c4 lever and gain speed, with Nb5 and e4 available early.
Can the Jobava be played against every defense?
Against almost every reply to 1.d4, yes, and that universality is what makes it economical. The practical exception is the setups where Black hits d4 immediately with ...c5 and ...Qb6: those demand accurate moves, and are worth knowing before you rely on the scheme on autopilot.
Openings mentioned in this guide
- Jobava London System (D00)
- London System (D02)
- Slav Defense (D10)
- King's Indian Defense (E60)
- Queen's Gambit Declined (QGD) (D30)
Check whether the Jobava fits your history
Import your Chess.com or Lichess games and compare your real score with 1.d4, by structure and by time control, before you switch repertoires.
Create a free account