Tournament coverage

Brazil's round 7 opponents at the Olympiad: how Tajikistan and Vietnam play

In the ten opponents' 270 White games, 1.e4 appears five times — never twice from the same player. Brazil can prepare its Black repertoire against 1.d4 on all eight boards, and the question becomes which 1.d4.

21 min read · Published on 2026-09-21 · Updated on 2026-09-29

Short answer

In round 7 of the 46th Chess Olympiad, on 23 September 2026, Brazil face Tajikistan in the open section, on table 21, and Vietnam in the women's section, on table 15. Drawing on 528 classical games broadcast on Lichess over the last three years, this article shows each player's repertoire in both squads, the lines where each scores below their own average, where the engine finds the most errors and what the online repertoire adds — always with the number of games next to each percentage, because that number says how much of the dossier holds up.

Event: 46th FIDE Chess Olympiad

How this was compiled: Researched on 21 September 2026, with round 6 finished and round 7 still to be played: it starts on 23 September at 3 pm Samarkand time (10:00 UTC), after the rest day. The pairings were checked on chess-results; the official PGN with each team's line-up only comes out when the round starts, so this dossier covers both opponents' full squads rather than the four boards. The repertoire uses the 528 classical over-the-board games from the last three years broadcast on Lichess, linked to each player by FIDE ID — 363 from the Tajik squad and 165 from the Vietnamese. The error profile measures each player's 12 most recent games with Stockfish 19 at depth 16; for Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev it was 11, because one game could not be read and was logged as a failure. Every move quoted in the text was re-measured at depth 24, with a dedicated search and a clean hash, and endgames of up to seven pieces were checked in the Lichess tablebase. The blitz and rapid repertoire comes from verified Chess.com accounts, over a 90-day window.

The essentials in a few lines

  • In round 7, on 23 September 2026, Brazil face Tajikistan in the open section (table 21) and Vietnam in the women's section (table 15). All four teams have 8 match points. The line-up only appears in the official PGN when the round starts, so this dossier covers all ten players in both squads.
  • Nine of the ten opponents open 1.d4 in most of their White games, and in the 270 White games in the sample 1.e4 appears five times, never twice from the same player. The exception is Mekhriddin Sharifov, who opens 1.Nf3 or 1.c4 in 15 of 19.
  • Three Tajiks score below their own average after 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6: Muhammad Khusenkhojaev scores 38.9% in 9 games, Jaloliddin Ilkhomi 56.5% in 31 and Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev 65.2% in 23. With 3...c5 after 3.g3, Mustafokhuja drops to 50.0% in 7 and Ilkhomi to 44.4% in 9.
  • Luong Phuong Hanh scores 30.4% with Black in 28 games against opponents who are, on average, at her own level. In the Sicilian with 2...e6, her reply to 1.e4, she scored 10.0% in 5 classical games, and the same hole shows up in her rapid games on Chess.com: 23.5% in 17.
  • In round 6, played today, two Tajiks got away with draws from endgames the tablebase calls decided. Mekhriddin Sharifov had a won ending against David Navara and played 64...Kf4, which draws; Jaloliddin Ilkhomi walked into a lost ending with 74.Ka4 and drew anyway.

The round 7 picture

Who do Brazil face in round 7 of the 2026 Chess Olympiad?

In the open section, Tajikistan, on table 21. In the women's section, Vietnam, on table 15. The round starts on 23 September 2026 at 3 pm Samarkand time, after the rest day. Each team's line-up only appears in the official PGN when the round starts, so the dossier covers all five players in each opposing squad: Mekhriddin Sharifov, Muhammad Khusenkhojaev, Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev, Jaloliddin Ilkhomi and Amin Kabilov for Tajikistan; Pham Le Thao Nguyen, Vo Thi Kim Phung, Nguyen Thi Mai Hung, Luong Phuong Hanh and Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong for Vietnam.

Brazil reach the seventh round after drawing 2–2 with Belgium in the open section and beating Paraguay 4–0 in the women's. All four teams in these matches have 8 match points. In the open, Tajikistan have 14.5 game points to Brazil's 13; in the women's, Brazil have 17 to Vietnam's 16.

On rating, the two matches point in opposite directions. In the open, Brazil are seed 31 and face seed 61. In the women's section it is the other way round: Brazil are seed 44 and face seed 21, a team that opened the Olympiad with three wins, lost 1–3 to Poland, beat Norway 4–0 and lost 0–4 to France in round 6. Tajikistan are also coming off a defeat: 1–3 against the Czech Republic, with two draws that the engine section covers in detail.

The sample column in the table below says how much of each dossier holds up. Jaloliddin Ilkhomi has 131 broadcast classical games in three years, the largest in either match; Vo Thi Kim Phung has 15 and Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong 16. None of the ten falls below 10, the point at which the dossier flags low confidence, but the two Vietnamese players only played Olympiads in this window: all 15 of Vo's games and all 16 of Bach's come from the Budapest and Samarkand Olympiads. That is 528 games in total, 363 Tajik and 165 Vietnamese.

Only Ilkhomi and Bach have played all six rounds. Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev, top board on the Tajik list, sat out round 6; Nguyen Thi Mai Hung sat out rounds 4 and 6. Olympiad teams rotate their squads, which is why the dossier covers all five on each side instead of trying to guess four.

Round 7 opposing squads, with the rating from the official PGN of the last round each player played. The sample is the number of classical over-the-board games from the last three years broadcast on Lichess. Percentages are from the opponent's point of view: a low number is good for Brazil. Neither team had announced its line-up at the time of writing.
SectionPlayerRatingSampleWhiteBlack
Open (Tajikistan)FM Mekhriddin Sharifov24194168.4% in 1940.9% in 22
Open (Tajikistan)IM Muhammad Khusenkhojaev24088662.8% in 4369.8% in 43
Open (Tajikistan)IM Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev24048569.3% in 4453.7% in 41
Open (Tajikistan)IM Jaloliddin Ilkhomi239113160.7% in 7040.2% in 61
Open (Tajikistan)FM Amin Kabilov22852060.0% in 1045.0% in 10
Women (Vietnam)IM Pham Le Thao Nguyen23484057.5% in 2052.5% in 20
Women (Vietnam)WGM Vo Thi Kim Phung23111564.3% in 756.2% in 8
Women (Vietnam)WGM Nguyen Thi Mai Hung22773954.8% in 2144.4% in 18
Women (Vietnam)WGM Luong Phuong Hanh22105553.7% in 2730.4% in 28
Women (Vietnam)WIM Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong20981677.8% in 964.3% in 7

Tajikistan: four 1.d4 players and one exception

How do Brazil's open-section opponents play in round 7?

Four of the five Tajiks open 1.d4 and build the game around g3, Catalan-style: Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev did so in 43 of his 44 White games in the sample. Against 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6, three of them score below their own average — Muhammad Khusenkhojaev drops to 38.9% in 9 games. With Black, Jaloliddin Ilkhomi scores 32.0% in 25 games against 1.e4, and 28.6% in 14 in the French.

Preparing for Tajikistan starts with a rare certainty. Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev opened 1.d4 in 43 of the 44 White games broadcast over three years, Muhammad Khusenkhojaev in 39 of 43, Jaloliddin Ilkhomi in 60 of 70 and Amin Kabilov in 8 of 10. It is not only the first move that repeats. Mustafokhuja's and Ilkhomi's most-played openings are the same three — the Catalan, the Fianchetto Benoni and the Bogo-Indian with the bishop retreat — all born from 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3. The team has a home, and it is on g2.

That home is exactly where the most useful edge in the match shows up. After 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6, Muhammad Khusenkhojaev scores 38.9% in 9 games, against his own 62.8% White average; Ilkhomi scores 56.5% in 31, and Mustafokhuja 65.2% in 23, below his 69.3%. When Black meets 3.g3 with 3...c5, the number falls further: 50.0% in 7 games for Mustafokhuja and 44.4% in 9 for Ilkhomi, with six draws. These are samples of seven and nine games, a medium-confidence hint rather than a finished plan, but it is the same hint in two different players, which is worth more than a large number for just one.

Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev has the best White score in the squad, 69.3% in 44 games, and is its most predictable player. With Black he drops to 53.7% in 41 and has no clear weak spot: against 1.e4 he scores 52.3% in 22 games, close to his own average, answering 1...e5 in 21 of them. The Italian with 3...Bc5 4.d3 gave him 33.3% in 3, a sample that supports nothing.

Muhammad Khusenkhojaev is the opposite case, and the one the table most misleads about. He scores 69.8% with Black in 43 games, the best Black score in either squad, in a sample where his opponents average 2259 — about 150 points below him. It is the number of someone who played a lot of opens and beat the weaker players, not of someone who neutralises a master's White. Against 1.e4 he drops to 63.6% in 22, and within that 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 gives him 57.9% in 19, the team's most reliable weak line by sample size.

Jaloliddin Ilkhomi has the largest sample in the match and the most exploitable asymmetry. With White he scores 60.7% in 70 games; with Black, 40.2% in 61. Against 1.e4 the number drops to 32.0% in 25 games, with two wins, and the French he chooses in 15 of them gives him 33.3% — 28.6% in the 14 that continue 2.d4 d5. The Caro-Kann is no better: 31.2% in 8.

Mekhriddin Sharifov is the squad's top-rated player, at 2419, and the only one who does not play 1.d4: he opens 1.Nf3 or 1.c4 in 15 of his 19 White games and scores 68.4%. With Black he drops to 40.9% in 22, and against 1.d4 to 28.6% in 7. His rating has risen quickly — the median in the sample is 2259 — so the older games describe a weaker player than today's. Amin Kabilov, the fifth, has 20 games and the longest in the team: a median of 101 half-moves, with 75% of games going past move 40.

Vietnam: five 1.d4 players and a Sicilian that does not work

How do Brazil's women's-section opponents play in round 7?

All five Vietnamese players open 1.d4 in most of their White games — Nguyen Thi Mai Hung in 21 of 21 and Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong in 9 of 9. With Black, the clearest weak spot belongs to Luong Phuong Hanh, who scores 30.4% in 28 games and 10.0% in 5 with the 2...e6 Sicilian. Pham Le Thao Nguyen, the squad's top player, drops to 41.7% in 6 games in the Caro-Kann.

Vietnam repeat Tajikistan's pattern with even less variety. Nguyen Thi Mai Hung opened 1.d4 in all 21 White games in the sample, Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong in all 9, Pham Le Thao Nguyen in 19 of 20, Vo Thi Kim Phung in 6 of 7 and Luong Phuong Hanh in 21 of 27, with 1.Nf3 in 5 of the other 6. Brazil go into the women's match knowing the first move of the opposing White player on four boards, and the work shifts to a different question: what to do with their own White.

That is where the best news of the match lies. Luong Phuong Hanh scores 30.4% with Black in 28 games, and the number is not an effect of strong opposition: her opponents in the sample average 2196, against her own 2210. Against 1.d4 it is 12.5% in 8, with seven losses; against 1.e4, 36.7% in 15. Against 1.e4 she answers with the Sicilian, and the 2.Nf3 e6 version gave her 10.0% in 5 games. Five games are few, and the dossier flags low confidence — but the online accounts section shows the same hole in a different sample, and two independent samples pointing to the same place are worth more than one.

Pham Le Thao Nguyen, the squad's top player at 2348, has the most balanced profile: 57.5% with White and 52.5% with Black, 20 games each. Against 1.e4 she drops to 40.0% in 10, and the Caro-Kann she plays in 6 of them gives 41.7%, with three losses. With White, after 1.d4 Nf6 she scores 50.0% in 13, below the 60.5% she makes when she opens 1.d4; 1.d4 d5 gives her 83.3% in 6. Whoever has Black against her meets more resistance after 1...d5 than after 1...Nf6.

Nguyen Thi Mai Hung plays more outside the Olympiad than her teammates — Biel, the Doeberl Cup and the Melbourne Open, in 36 of her 39 games — and has the most middling numbers: 54.8% with White, 44.4% with Black. Against 1.e4 she scores 38.9% in 9, almost always with the French, which gives her 42.9% in 7. The Slav gave her 20.0% in 5, a small sample.

Vo Thi Kim Phung and Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong have the prettiest numbers and the narrowest samples. Bach scores 77.8% in 9 White games and 64.3% in 7 with Black; Vo, 64.3% and 56.2%. All of it comes from two Olympiads, where part of the rounds are against much weaker teams. The only slice the dossier can register is Bach's in the Nimzo-Indian, 66.7% in 6, below her White average — and still a high number.

Where the engine finds the errors

In which phase of the game do the Tajik and Vietnamese players lose the most evaluation?

In each player's 12 most recent games, measured with Stockfish 19 at depth 16, all ten opponents lose between 5 and 9 centipawns per move in the opening. The difference appears in the middlegame: Muhammad Khusenkhojaev and Mekhriddin Sharifov lose 42 and 41. In round 6, played today, two Tajiks drew endgames that the tablebase calls decided — one won, one lost.

The table shows the average evaluation loss per move in each phase, with the number of moves measured alongside. The opening column is the most uniform in both squads, from 5 to 9, and confirms what the repertoire already said: these are prepared players who reach the middlegame without having lost anything. The middlegame is another matter. Sharifov loses 41 centipawns per move over 368 moves, the largest middlegame base in the match, and Muhammad Khusenkhojaev 42 over 221. Jaloliddin Ilkhomi and Pham Le Thao Nguyen sit at 21, the cleanest in that phase.

The most expensive error in the sample was played today. In round 6, against David Navara, Mekhriddin Sharifov reached a rook-versus-three-pawns ending with his king on e4 and a pawn on h5. The Lichess tablebase, which gives the exact result with up to seven pieces, says the position was winning and that four moves won — 64...h4, 64...Rf1, 64...Ra5 and 64...Ke5. Sharifov played 64...Kf4, which the same tablebase calls a draw, and the game was drawn. In July, at the Oskemen Open, he was +5.25 against Assel Serikbay and played 51...Bc3: the evaluation went to −9.70 and he lost.

In the same match, Jaloliddin Ilkhomi went the opposite way. Against Nguyen Thai Dai Van, in a rook versus rook and two pawns ending that the tablebase calls a draw, he played 74.Ka4 and walked into a lost position — mate in 57 by the tablebase. His opponent did not find the way and the game was drawn. In round 3, against Libya, the story was similar: 46...Re2+ took the evaluation from −0.31 to −3.53 when re-measured at depth 24, and Ilkhomi drew. At Oskemen in July he let two five-pawn advantages slip — 41...Rxa2 against Aziz Degenbaev, which ended in a draw, and 60.Kb3 against Erasyl Zhakan, which he won anyway.

On the Vietnamese side, the pattern is an advantage that gets away. Against Niina Koskela of Norway, in round 5 of this Olympiad, Luong Phuong Hanh was +6.77 when she played 25...Bh2+, and the evaluation went to zero; she won all the same. At the 2026 Asian Women's Championship, against Zol-Uchral Erdenesaikhan, she was +5.20 and played 42...Qe3: the evaluation went to −6.14 and she lost. Nguyen Thi Mai Hung drew with GM Diptayan Ghosh in Biel after two moves the engine calls losing, 52...h4 and 60...a3 — the second took the evaluation from −0.15 to −10.73. Pham Le Thao Nguyen lost to Srija Seshadri at the 2025 Asian Championship after 70.Ra8, which took an ending from −0.64 to −5.34.

The high numbers in the table do not always describe errors. Amin Kabilov's endgames (43 centipawns over 156 moves) and Luong Phuong Hanh's (46 over 111) are the most expensive in the match, and the re-measurement shows why: Kabilov's three worst moments and Luong's two worst were played in positions that were already lost, several of them with mate on the board. The same goes for Vo Thi Kim Phung, whose five worst moments all come in decided positions. It is the pattern that repeats every round in this series: at depth 16, a settled position produces losses of thousands of centipawns for moves that change nothing, and the errors that changed a result showed up with modest losses.

The blunder count stays out of the table for the same reason: the classification uses the uncapped loss, so a lost player who picks the opponent's fastest mate adds a blunder without having changed anything. The average loss per move caps each evaluation at a thousand centipawns and does not suffer from the same problem.

Average evaluation loss per move (centipawns) in each player's 12 most recent classical games, with Stockfish 19 at depth 16. In brackets, the number of moves measured in each phase. For Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev it was 11 games: one could not be read.
SectionPlayerOpeningMiddlegameEndgame
Open (Tajikistan)FM Mekhriddin Sharifov6 (101)41 (368)25 (127)
Open (Tajikistan)IM Muhammad Khusenkhojaev8 (103)42 (221)23 (284)
Open (Tajikistan)IM Mustafokhuja Khusenkhojaev5 (94)30 (234)16 (230)
Open (Tajikistan)IM Jaloliddin Ilkhomi7 (101)21 (213)18 (301)
Open (Tajikistan)FM Amin Kabilov8 (102)34 (350)43 (156)
Women (Vietnam)IM Pham Le Thao Nguyen6 (102)21 (300)24 (142)
Women (Vietnam)WGM Vo Thi Kim Phung6 (101)34 (274)24 (248)
Women (Vietnam)WGM Nguyen Thi Mai Hung9 (102)30 (342)14 (61)
Women (Vietnam)WGM Luong Phuong Hanh9 (102)33 (306)46 (111)
Women (Vietnam)WIM Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong6 (102)25 (283)24 (147)

What the online accounts show, and what they do not

Does the blitz and rapid repertoire of Brazil's opponents say the same thing?

All ten opponents have a verified Chess.com account, and four have a sample in the last 90 days: Nguyen Thi Mai Hung (300 games), Pham Le Thao Nguyen (298), Luong Phuong Hanh (287) and Jaloliddin Ilkhomi (32). In two of them the online games confirm the classical ones: Luong scores 23.5% in 17 games with the 2...e6 Sicilian, and Pham 0.0% in 6 in the Caro-Kann with 3.exd5.

This section answers a different question from the previous one, which is why it stands apart. A blitz and rapid repertoire is usually wider than a classical one, and what someone plays with three minutes is not what they prepare for a five-hour game. It tells you what they know and where they feel uncomfortable, not what they will play on Wednesday.

The most useful case is Luong Phuong Hanh's. On the amylazy account, with a WGM title verified by the platform, she played 287 games in 90 days and scored 35.4% with White and 37.0% with Black. In the Open Sicilian she plays with 2...e6, 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4, she scored 23.5% in 17 games, which the dossier flags as high confidence. It is the same structure in which she scored 10.0% in 5 classical games. Two samples, two time controls and the same result do not prove she will lose again, but they do say she is not at home there.

Pham Le Thao Nguyen, on the fh2411 account, repeats the Caro-Kann she plays over the board: it is her most frequent Black opening in 298 online games. Against the Exchange Variation, with 3.exd5, she scored 0.0% in 6. In classical games, the Caro-Kann gives her 41.7% in 6. With White she opens 1.d4 in 136 of her 147 online games, and the dossier records 27.8% in 18 after 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d5.

Nguyen Thi Mai Hung plays online at the same level as over the board, 54.3% with White and 46.6% with Black in 300 games, and opens 1.d4 in 149 of her 151 White games — the loyalty to the first move holds in blitz too. Jaloliddin Ilkhomi has 32 games, with 47.1% as White and 46.7% as Black: too small a sample for lines, enough to say he opens 1.d4 online as well, in 15 of 17. Bach Ngoc Thuy Duong has 2 games in the window, and two games are not a sample.

Five opponents have a verified account and no games in the last 90 days — Mustafokhuja and Muhammad Khusenkhojaev, Mekhriddin Sharifov, Amin Kabilov and Vo Thi Kim Phung, whose account has been inactive since 2022. The account exists and is idle, which is different from the account not existing. Sharifov's lists Palestine as its country, against his Tajik FIDE registration; it was included because the Chess.com player page, which links the athlete to the account, points to it.

What to watch in round 7

What does the dossier suggest for Brazil in round 7?

In both matches Brazil can count on 1.d4 from the opposing White players, with the exception of Mekhriddin Sharifov. In the open section, the most repeated edge is 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6, where three Tajiks score below their own average. In the women's section, the best-supported line is Luong Phuong Hanh's Sicilian with 2...e6, which earns her little in classical and online games alike.

The practical question in the open section is the defence against 1.d4, and the dossier answers with a direction, not a variation: Black players who go 2...e6 and accept the Catalan game find the Tajiks below their average, and 3...c5 after 3.g3 is where Mustafokhuja and Ilkhomi score least. With White, the target is Ilkhomi, who scores 32.0% in 25 games against 1.e4. Muhammad Khusenkhojaev is the warning: his 69.8% with Black looks frightening and comes, in large part, from opponents 150 points weaker.

In the women's section Brazil are the lower-rated team, and the dossier does not change that. What it offers is two concrete points. Against Luong Phuong Hanh, 1.e4 leads to the 2...e6 Sicilian that fails in both of her samples; against Pham Le Thao Nguyen, the Caro-Kann earns her little in classical games and nothing against the online Exchange. Both are hints built on five to seventeen games — enough to choose an opening the night before, not to promise a result.

When the round starts and the official PGN brings the line-up, the dossier file attached to this article will show the four boards and each table's game, with no need for the text to change. Until then, what is here is the full squad. Ten opponents, 270 White games and five 1.e4s: rarely does the eve of a round come with such a well-defined question.

Frequently asked questions

Where does the data in Brazil's opponent dossier come from?

From classical over-the-board games broadcast on Lichess over the last three years, linked to each player by FIDE ID — 528 games across both squads, 363 Tajik and 165 Vietnamese. On top of them run the repertoire by colour, the lines where the opponent scores below their own average and, on the 12 most recent games, the error profile measured with Stockfish 19 at depth 16, with every quoted move re-measured at depth 24 and endgames of up to seven pieces checked in the tablebase. The blitz and rapid repertoire comes from verified Chess.com accounts and sits in a separate section.

Are the dossier's percentages Brazil's or the opponent's?

Always the opponent's. When the text says Luong Phuong Hanh scores 10.0% in 5 games with the 2...e6 Sicilian, the number is her score in that line: the lower it is, the better for whoever faces her. The same applies to the White and Black columns in the squad table.

Why doesn't the article say who plays on each board?

Because each team's line-up is only published in the official PGN when the round starts. The pairings between teams come out earlier, on chess-results, which is what allows the dossier to be written the day before. Since four of the five registered players almost always play, covering the full squad solves it: when the line-up comes out, the dossier file attached to this article will show the four boards and the round's game.

Why can a high percentage in the table not mean strength?

Because a score depends on who it was made against. Muhammad Khusenkhojaev scores 69.8% with Black in 43 games, but in a sample where his opponents average 2259, about 150 points below him; Luong Phuong Hanh scores 30.4% with Black against opposition at her own level. The first number describes the schedule, and the second describes the player. That is why the text states the strength of the opposition when it changes how the table reads.

Update log

  • 2026-09-21 — First published, with the round 7 pairings checked on chess-results and the round still to be played: repertoire from 528 classical games broadcast on Lichess, error profile with Stockfish 19 at depth 16 and the blitz and rapid repertoire of the verified accounts. The dossiers cover both opponents' full squads; when the line-up comes out, the same file will show the four boards and the round's game.
  • 2026-09-29 — The Olympiad ended on 27 September: Uzbekistan won the open and China the women's event. This coverage is no longer updated; the final result is in the standings story.

Sources

Related guides

Your next opponent also has a line where they score less

The Personal Chess Coach dossier reads the public games of whoever you are about to face and shows the repertoire by colour, the lines where they score below their own average, and the number of games behind every figure.

Create a free account